Ex Parte Asada - Page 17




               Appeal No. 2006-2169                                                                       Page 17                   
               Application No. 09/899,919                                                                                           


                       Here, the preposition "to" is "used as a function word to indicate movement or an                            
               action or condition suggestive of movement toward a place, person, or thing reached. .                               
               . ."  Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary 1238 (1990) (copy attached).  Giving the                             
               claim the broadest, reasonable construction, the limitations require that the distal end of                          
               the aforementioned legs slants from a first face toward a second face.                                               


                                                2. Obviousness Determination                                                        
                       "As shown in FIGS. 11 and 12 [of van Woesik], the fibre fixing clip 12 . . .                                 
               comprises a flat base 62 from opposite edges of which depend respective fibre retention                              
               plates 64, each of which comprises a pair of legs 66 each having a tapered free end                                  
               portion 68. . . ."  (Col. 4, ll. 63-68.)  More specifically, we find that Figure 12 of the                           
               primary reference shows that each of the tapered free end portion 68 slants from one                                 
               face of its leg 64 toward the other face of its leg.  Although each slant meets an                                   
               opposing slant to form the aforementioned taper, the claim does not preclude such a                                  
               meeting.  Therefore, we affirm the rejection of claim 4.                                                             


                                                       III. CONCLUSION                                                              
                       For the aforementioned reasons, the rejection of claims 1-4 under § 103(a) is                                
               affirmed.                                                                                                            









Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007