Appeal 2006-2254
Application 10/182,369
of obviousness with respect to the argued claims under consideration which
has not been successfully rebutted by Appellant. Therefore, the rejections
under review are affirmed.
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons and those set forth in the Answer, having
considered Appellant's arguments, based on the totality of the record, we
determine that the Examiner has established prima facie of cases of
unpatentability under §§ 102 and 103 which have not been adequately
rebutted by Appellant. Accordingly, the Examiner's rejections under
35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103 have been affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(iv)(2004).
AFFIRMED
cam
Mark S. Bicks
ROYLANCE ABRAMS BERDO & GOODMAN
Suite 600
1300 19th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20036
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Last modified: November 3, 2007