The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte WOLFGANG BREMSER, THOMAS KRUGER, WILMA LOCKEN,
STEPHAN SCHWARTE, and HEINZ-PETER RINK
_____________
Appeal No. 2006-2268
Application No. 10/468,448
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before WALTZ, KRATZ, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal the Examiner’s final rejection of claims
1 to 14, 16 to 21, and 23 to 27. We have jurisdiction under 351
U.S.C. § 134.
1The Examiner has indicated that the subject matter of claims 15
and 22 is allowable, however these claims are objected to as depending
upon a rejected claim. (Answer, p. 2).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007