Ex Parte Glorioso et al - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                      
                           for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                             

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                                 ____________                                                     
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                                 ____________                                                     
                             Ex parte JOEY GLORIOSO, JAMES H. BURGESS,                                            
                                           and JIANSHENG TANG                                                     
                                                 ____________                                                     
                                               Appeal 2006-2270                                                   
                                            Application 10/478,569                                                
                                            Technology Center 1700                                                
                                                 ____________                                                     
                                         Decided: September 26, 2006                                              
                                                 ____________                                                     

                Before KRATZ, JEFFREY T. SMITH, and TIMM, Administrative Patent                                   
                Judges.                                                                                           
                KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     
                       This appeal involves claims 1-25, the only claims pending in this                          
                application.1  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                  




                                                                                                                 
                1 An Oral Hearing took place on September 14, 2006.                                               




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007