Ex Parte Corbeil et al - Page 1



            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                     
                      publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                   
                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                         ____________                                                          
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                 
                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                         ____________                                                          
                                 Ex parte JAMES L. CORBEIL,                                                    
                              TROY MARLAR, MATTHIAS J. SCHMAND                                                 
                            NIRAJ K. DOSHI and MARK S. ANDREACO                                                
                                         ____________                                                          
                                    Appeal No. 2006-2314                                                       
                                 Application No. 10/856,225                                                    
                                         ____________                                                          
                                           ON BRIEF                                                            
                                         ____________                                                          
          Before KRATZ, FRANKLIN, and, GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent                                         
          Judges.                                                                                              
          KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                  

                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                         
                This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                                         
          rejection of claims 1-18, which are all of the claims pending in                                     
          this application.                                                                                    
                                         BACKGROUND                                                            
                Appellants’ invention relates to a method for optically                                        
          segmenting a target media for use in an imaging device and a                                         
          detector component formed thereby.  In this regard, appellants                                       
          indicate that a position decoding detector or optically segmented                                    
          light guide can be formed by using laser technology to segment a                                     
          specified target media.  See, e.g., page 9, numbered paragraph                                       












Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007