Ex Parte Page - Page 1



                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                       

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                          
                                             ____________                                                 
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                 
                                             ____________                                                 
                                      Ex parte  BRUCE W. PAGE                                             
                                             ____________                                                 
                                           Appeal 2006-2404                                               
                                         Application 10/884,619                                           
                                        Technology Center 1700                                            
                                             ____________                                                 
                                      Decided: September 28, 2006                                         
                                             ____________                                                 

               Before GARRIS, WALTZ, and GAUDETTE,  Administrative Patent                                 
               Judges.                                                                                    
               WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                        

                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                
                     This is a decision on an appeal from the Primary Examiner’s Final                    
               Rejection of claims 1 through 7, which are the only claims pending in this                 
               application.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                            
                     According to Appellant, the invention is directed to a method of                     
               removing methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) from an aqueous solution by                    
               passing the solution through a counter-current air stripper packed with open               





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007