Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex Parte Sayman et al - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2006 > Ex Parte Sayman et al - Page 1

            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                  
            publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                          

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                                __________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                                __________                                                  
                 Ex parte ROBERT ANTHONY SAYMAN, JAMES HENRY DeVORE, ,                                      
            RONALD PETER MUETZEL, MUNEER ABUSAMRA and RUPERT KRAMER                                         
                                                __________                                                  
                                          Appeal No. 2006-2414                                              
            Application No.10/668,514                                                                       
                                               ___________                                                  
                                                ON BRIEF                                                    
                                               ___________                                                  
            Before THOMAS, RUGGIERO, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.                              
            THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            


                                                DECISION                                                    


                   Appellants have appealed to Board from the examiner’s final rejection of                 
            claims 1 through 18.                                                                            









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007