Ex Parte Pawlowski et al - Page 2




         Appeal No. 2006-2443                                                       
         Application No. 10/012,968                                                 

         in a display device, best illustrated by reference to independent          
         claim 30, reproduced as follows:                                           
              30.  A method comprising:                                             
              sending auto-zero signals from a panel controller to a                
         display panel; and                                                         
              responsive to the auto-zero signals, bleeding off                     
         accumulated charge in pixels of the display panel.                         
              The examiner relies on the following references:                      
         Kuribayashi et al. (Kuribayashi) 5,615,027  Mar. 25, 1997                  
         Stoye          5,969,696  Oct. 19, 1999                                    

              Claim 30 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as                  
         anticipated by Kuribayashi.                                                
              Claims 31, 32, and 34 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103           
         as unpatentable over Kuribayashi in view of Stoye.                         
              Reference is made to the briefs and answer for the                    
         respective positions of appellants and the examiner.                       















                                         2                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007