Ex Parte Iyer et al - Page 1



                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                       
                      written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                      

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                            ________________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                            ________________                                                  
                                   Ex parte SUBRAMANYAM A. IYER,                                              
                               VIJAYAKUMAR S. RAMACHANDRARAO,                                                 
                                      and ROBERT B. TURKOT, JR.                                               
                                            ________________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2006-2444                                                 
                                           Application 10/342,053                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                              
                                            ________________                                                  
                                       Decided:  September 20, 2006                                           
                                            ________________                                                  
                Before PAK, WALTZ, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent                                
                Judges.                                                                                       
                WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      This is a decision on an appeal from the Primary Examiner’s final                       
                rejection of claims 1 through 3, 8, and 11 through 18, which are the only                     
                claims pending in this application.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to                         
                35 U.S.C. § 134.                                                                              

                                                                                                             




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007