Ex Parte Spears et al - Page 2




               Appeal No. 2006-2572                                                                                  
               Application No. 10/437,569                                                                            

                                                  BACKGROUND                                                         
                      The Appellants’ invention relates to a compact integrated optical imaging assembly.            
               An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1,                 
               which is reproduced below.                                                                            

                          1.    An assembly for an image capture device, comprising:                                 
                          an imaging lens;                                                                           
                          an optical spacer physically integrated with the imaging lens; and                         
                          a photo-sensing system physically integrated with the optical spacer,                      
                      the optical spacer having a plurality of reflective surfaces adapted to receive                
                      an image light from the imaging lens and direct the image light toward the                     
                      photo-sensing system.                                                                          

                   The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed          
               claims are:                                                                                           
                   Miksch et al. (Miksch)  6,160,250    Dec. 12, 2000                                                
                   Hayashi    2003/0184825    Oct. 02, 2003                                                          
                                                                              (filed Feb. 19, 2003)                  
                   Feng    6,775,077    Aug. 10, 2004                                                                
                                                                              (filed Sept. 22, 2000)                 
                   Graber et al. (Graber)  2004/0178373    Sept. 16, 2004                                            
                                                                              (filed Mar. 14, 2003)                  

                                                   REJECTIONS                                                        
                      Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and the              
               Appellants regarding the above-noted rejections, we make reference to the examiner's answer           



                                                        -2-                                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007