Ex Parte Wolf et al - Page 1




                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written               
                                  for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                        

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                   
                                                   __________                                                       
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                     
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                   __________                                                       
                                            Ex parte FRED R. WOLF,                                                  
                                           GORDON N. MCGREW, and                                                    
                                                HENRY T. TYRPIN                                                     
                                                   __________                                                       
                                              Appeal No. 2006-2604                                                  
                                            Application No. 10/253,066                                              
                                                   __________                                                       
                                                    ON BRIEF                                                        
                                                   __________                                                       
             Before GRIMES, LINCK, and LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                      
             GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                   
                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     
                    This appeal involves claims to a method of making chewing gum containing an                     
             encapsulated cooling agent.  The examiner has rejected the claims as obvious.  We                      
             have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134.  We affirm.                                                   
                                                   Background                                                       
                    “[F]or a cool and refreshing taste, cooling flavors such as encapsulated menthol                
             and/or mint flavors are added to chewing gum.”  Specification, page 5.  “However, the                  
             improved flavor impact of adding cooling flavors to the chewing gum is somewhat offset                 
             by the disadvantage of the bitter, harsh, burning sensations associated with high                      
             concentrations of such flavors.”  Id.                                                                  






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007