Ex Parte Monson - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                        
                           for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                               

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                  ____________                                                      
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                  ____________                                                      
                                     Ex parte ROBERT JAMES MONSON                                                   
                                                  ____________                                                      
                                                Appeal 2006-2612                                                    
                                             Application 10/225,316                                                 
                                            Technology Center 1700                                                  
                                                  ____________                                                      
                                         Decided:  September 20, 2006                                               
                                                  ____________                                                      

                 Before GARRIS, KRATZ, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent                                  
                 Judges.                                                                                            
                 KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                

                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                       This is an appeal from the Examiner’s Final Rejection of claims 1-16                         
                 and 21.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                         











Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007