The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte THERESA CHIH-LEI MIAO SPEAR
and GEORGE DARYL BLANKENSHIP
______________
Appeal 2006-2619
Application 10/935,566
Technology Center 1725
_______________
Decided: August 31, 2006
_______________
Before WARREN, WALTZ, and FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the
examiner finally rejecting claims 1 through 3, 8 through 10 and 17 through
21, and refusing to allow claims 4 through 7 and 11 through 16 as amended
subsequent to the final rejection. Claims 1 through 21 are all of the claims
in the application.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007