Appeal No. 2006-2629
Application No. 09/887,066
For the above reasons we conclude that the examiner has not
carried the burden of establishing a prima facie case of
obviousness of the appellants’ claimed invention.
DECISION
The rejection of claims 9-23 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over
Issenmann in view of Cheney is reversed.
REVERSED
)
TERRY J. OWENS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
THOMAS A. WALTZ ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
LINDA M. GAUDETTE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007