Ex Parte Amling et al - Page 1




                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                       
                                publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  


                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                                    ____________                                                        
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                    ____________                                                        
                              Ex parte MARC R. AMLING and DAVID CHATENEVER                                              
                                                    ____________                                                        
                                                Appeal No. 2006-2638                                                    
                                              Application No. 10/095,616                                                
                                                    ____________                                                        
                                              HEARD: October 18, 2006                                                   
                                                    ____________                                                        
              Before HAIRSTON, BARRY, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.                                    
              BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                 




                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       
                     This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. ' 134 from the examiner=s final                       
              rejection of claims 1-11 and 13-38.                                                                       
                     We affirm-in-part.                                                                                 














Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007