Ex Parte Boehler et al - Page 1




             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                               
                                                  ____________                                                 
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                 
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                     
                                                ____________                                                   
                                          Ex parte BERT BEOHLER,                                               
                             JEAN-MARIE CLEMENT, PETRA TAMARA GIESEN                                           
                                              AND MARC ROSE                                                    
                                                ____________                                                   
                                            Appeal No. 2006-2736                                               
                                          Application No. 10/038,167                                           
                                                ____________                                                   
                                            HEARD: Oct. 18, 2006                                               
                                                ____________                                                   
             Before HAIRSTON, BARRY, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.                            
             BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               


                   A patent examiner rejected claims 1-9.  The appellants appeal therefrom under               
             35 U.S.C. § 134(a).  We affirm.                                                                   


                                              I. BACKGROUND                                                    
                   The invention at issue on appeal displays medical images.  Computed                         
             tomography ("CT") and magnetic resonance tomography ("MR") are used to generate                   
             and visualize three-dimensional ("3D") medical data.  The "clip plane" in such a                  
             3D visualization can be rotated or displaced; an object being visualized can be rotated           
             or zoomed inside a volume such as a human body.  (Spec. at 1.)                                    








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007