onecle - legal research

Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex Parte Wolffe et al - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2006 > Ex Parte Wolffe et al - Page 1

Sponsored Links




                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                 
                           for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                         
                                                                                                             
                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                          
                                                 __________                                                   
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                                 __________                                                   
                               Ex parte   ALAN WOLFFE and FYODOR URNOV                                        
                                                 __________                                                   
                                            Appeal No. 2006-2851                                              
                                          Application No. 09/844,501                                          
                                                 __________                                                   
                                                 ON BRIEF                                                     
                                                 __________                                                   
            Before ADAMS, MILLS, and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges.                                    
            MILLS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                   This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final               
            rejection of claims 123-152.                                                                      
                   Claims 123 reads as follows:                                                               
                   123.  A method for preparing a library of regulatory DNA sequences from a cell,            
            the method comprising:                                                                            
                   (a) providing a cell nucleus, wherein the nucleus comprises cellular chromatin;            
                   (b) contacting the nucleus with a first enzyme, wherein the first enzyme reacts            
            with accessible regions of cellular chromatin;                                                    
                   (c) deproteinizing the cellular chromatin to generate deproteinized DNA;                   










Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007