Ex Parte Schwark et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                     
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                            

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                               
                                                ____________                                                    
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                     
                                                ____________                                                    
                                     Ex parte DWIGHT W. SCHWARK,                                                
                                           DREW V. SPEER AND                                                    
                                          LARRY B. MCALLISTER                                                   
                                                ____________                                                    
                                              Appeal 2006-2900                                                  
                                           Application 10/683,531                                               
                                           Technology Center 1700                                               
                                                ____________                                                    
                                          Decided: October 27, 2006                                             
                                                ____________                                                    

                Before KIMLIN, WALTZ, and GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.                               
                KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            


                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                       This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-6, 9-16, and                      
                18-22.  Claim 1 is illustrative:                                                                









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007