Ex Parte Ingvarsson et al - Page 1




                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                       
                          written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                      
                                                                                                                 


                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                     

                                                 __________                                                       

                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                      
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                 __________                                                       

                Ex parte SNORRI THORGEIR INGVARSSON, PHILIP LOUIS TROUILLOUD,                                     
                SHOUHENG SUN, ROGER HILSEN KOCH, and DAVID WILLIAM ABRAHAM                                        
                                                 __________                                                       

                                            Appeal No. 2006-2982                                                  
                                         Application No. 10/458,112                                               
                                                 __________                                                       

                                                   ON BRIEF                                                       
                                                 __________                                                       

             Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                  

             JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            



                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     

             This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                                      

             examiner’s rejection of claims 1-6, 8-20, 22-30 and 38.  The examiner has                            

             indicated that claim 21 contains allowable subject matter if rewritten in                            

             independent form.  Claim 7 was cancelled by amendment and claims 31-37                               

             have been cancelled in response to a restriction requirement.                                        








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007