Ex Parte Zeng et al - Page 1





                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                               
                           for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                               


                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                         
                                                        _______________                                                             
                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                          
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                               
                                                        _______________                                                             
                       Ex Parte XIAOLAN ZENG, WEI ZHANG, and ALEXANDER C. SCHNEIDER                                                 
                                                      Appeal No. 2006-3040                                                          
                                                   Application No. 10/261,196                                                       
                                                        _______________                                                             
                                                            ON BRIEF                                                                
                                                        _______________                                                             

                   Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges.                                           
                   JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                        

                   This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final                                 
                   rejection of claims 1 and 3-52, which constitute all the claims pending in this application.                     
                   The examiner has now indicated that claims 48-52 contain allowable subject matter                                
                   [answer, page 13].  Therefore, this appeal is directed to the rejection of claims 1 and 3-47.                    
                   The disclosed invention pertains to methods and apparatus for segmenting an                                      
                   anatomical image.  The disclosed invention particularly relates to a first step of                               
                   presegmenting the image at a reduced resolution to identify a particular region and a                            
                   second step of further segmenting the identified region at a higher resolution to identify                       
                   finer anatomical structures.                                                                                     







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007