onecle - legal research

Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex Parte Jasperson et al - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2006 > Ex Parte Jasperson et al - Page 1

Sponsored Links



           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                                   
           written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                   

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                         ____________                                                           
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                 
                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                         ____________                                                           
                       Ex parte KEITH E. JASPERSON, THOMAS J. VALINE                                            
                                and FREDERIC J. R. WAHLQUIST                                                    
                                         ____________                                                           
                                    Appeal No. 2006-3056                                                        
                                 Application No. 10/278,769                                                     
                                         ____________                                                           
                                  HEARD: NOVEMBER 14, 2006                                                      
                                         ____________                                                           

           Before FRANKFORT, OWENS and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                      
           FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                              

                                      DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        

           This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                                               
           rejection of claims 1 through 24.  Claims 25 through 35, the only                                    
           other claims remaining in the application, have been withdrawn from                                  
           consideration.                                                                                       

           As noted on page 1 of the specification, appellants’ invention                                       
           relates to a drug infusion system that is programmable by a medical                                  
           professional and which provides a simple external means to select                                    












Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007