The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KEITH E. JASPERSON, THOMAS J. VALINE
and FREDERIC J. R. WAHLQUIST
____________
Appeal No. 2006-3056
Application No. 10/278,769
____________
HEARD: NOVEMBER 14, 2006
____________
Before FRANKFORT, OWENS and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 24. Claims 25 through 35, the only
other claims remaining in the application, have been withdrawn from
consideration.
As noted on page 1 of the specification, appellants’ invention
relates to a drug infusion system that is programmable by a medical
professional and which provides a simple external means to select
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007