Ex Parte Jasperson et al - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2006 > Ex Parte Jasperson et al - Page 1

           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                                   
           written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                   

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                         ____________                                                           
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                 
                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                         ____________                                                           
                       Ex parte KEITH E. JASPERSON, THOMAS J. VALINE                                            
                                and FREDERIC J. R. WAHLQUIST                                                    
                                         ____________                                                           
                                    Appeal No. 2006-3056                                                        
                                 Application No. 10/278,769                                                     
                                         ____________                                                           
                                  HEARD: NOVEMBER 14, 2006                                                      
                                         ____________                                                           

           Before FRANKFORT, OWENS and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                      
           FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                              

                                      DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        

           This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                                               
           rejection of claims 1 through 24.  Claims 25 through 35, the only                                    
           other claims remaining in the application, have been withdrawn from                                  
           consideration.                                                                                       

           As noted on page 1 of the specification, appellants’ invention                                       
           relates to a drug infusion system that is programmable by a medical                                  
           professional and which provides a simple external means to select                                    












Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 



Last modified: November  3, 2007