Ex Parte Finch et al - Page 1



                      The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                          
                       written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                         

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                              ________________                                                    
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                              ________________                                                    
                        Ex parte CHARLES W. FINCH and KENNETH E. FERSCH                                           
                                              ________________                                                    
                                               Appeal 2006-3191                                                   
                                            Application 10/397,765                                                
                                            Technology Center 1700                                                
                                              ________________                                                    
                                          Decided:  December 5, 2006                                              
                                              ________________                                                    

                Before WALTZ, JEFFREY T. SMITH, and GAUDETTE, Administrative                                      
                Patent Judges.                                                                                    
                WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     
                       This is a decision on an appeal from the Primary Examiner’s Final                          
                rejection of claims 1 through 20, which are the only claims pending in this                       
                application.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                   
                       According to Appellants, the invention is directed to a method of                          
                purifying pesticides to reduce the crystalline inhibiting impurities (Br. 2-3).                   
                Independent claim 1 is illustrative of the invention and is reproduced below:                     

                                                                                                                 




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007