The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JASON M. BREWER
__________
Appeal No. 2007-0028
Application No. 10/694,277
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 30 through 37, 42
through 46, 49 through 63, 66 through 70, 73 and 74. After consideration of the
brief, the examiner objected to claims 46 and 70 as being dependent upon a
rejected base claim, and indicated that the two claims would be allowable if
rewritten in independent claim form including all of the limitations of the base
claims and any intervening claims (answer, page 3). Accordingly, claims 30
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007