Ex Parte Panter et al - Page 1



                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                                
                        written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                               

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                      
                                                 ________________                                                        
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                       
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                 ________________                                                        
                          Ex parte RONALD L. PANTER and THOMAS A. HEROLD                                                 
                                                 ________________                                                        
                                                  Appeal 2007-0174                                                       
                                               Application 09/780,303                                                    
                                              Technology Center 1754                                                     
                                                 ________________                                                        
                                           Decided:  December 15, 2006                                                   
                                                 ________________                                                        
                 Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHUNG K. PAK, and                                                              
                 THOMAS A. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                          
                 KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                    

                                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                         
                        This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 9-17 and 20-27.                             
                 Claims 1-8, 18, and 19 have been allowed by the Examiner, and claims                                    
                 28-38 stand withdrawn from consideration.  Claim 9 is illustrative:                                     
                 9.  A method for making carbon fibers, the method including the steps of:                               
                 providing an elongated precursor fiber;                                                                 
                 providing a plurality of furnaces disposed adjacent one another                                         
                 in a serial side-by-side relationship and configured to heat the fiber to                               
                 different respective temperatures as the fiber is drawn through the furnaces;                           
                                                                                                                        




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007