Ex Parte Levi - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                      
                           for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                             

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                                 ____________                                                     
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                                 ____________                                                     
                                              Ex parte GUY LEVI                                                   
                                                 ____________                                                     
                                               Appeal 2007-0211                                                   
                                            Application 10/305,577                                                
                                            Technology Center 1700                                                
                                                 ____________                                                     
                                         Decided: November 24, 2006                                               
                                                 ____________                                                     

                Before KIMLIN, TIMM, and GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                  
                KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                              

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     
                This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 2, 4-6, 8-13, and 16-                     
                20.  Claim 1 is illustrative:                                                                     
                       1.    A w/o/w emulsion comprising:                                                         
                              (a) a primary phase comprising a water-in-oil emulsion; and                         
                              (b) an external aqueous phase,                                                      
                                                                                                                 






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007