Terranova V. Gatto - Page 2



              1                    ORDERDED that judgment on priority as to Count 1 (the sole                                        
              2    count in the interference; Paper 35, page 3) is awarded against Junior Party                                      
              3    Gilbarco Inc. (inventor: Steven N. Terranova).                                                                    
              4                    FURTHER ORDERED that Junior Party Gilbarco Inc.                                                   
              5    (inventor: Steven N. Terranova) is not entitled to a patent containing claims                                     
              6    1-9, 18-25, and 27 (corresponding to Count 1) of:                                                                 
              7                                      U.S. Patent 6,098,879                                                           
              8                                      issued 8 August 2000                                                            
              9                                                                                                                      
            10                     FURTHER ORDERED that Junior Party Gilbarco Inc.                                                   
            11     (inventor: Steven N. Terranova) is not entitled to a patent containing claims                                     
            12     1-33 (corresponding to Count 1) of:                                                                               
            13                                       U.S. Patent 6,422,464                                                           
            14                                        issued 23 July 2002                                                            
            15                                                                                                                       
            16                     FURTHER ORDERED that if there is an additional settlement                                         
            17     agreement, attention is directed to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c).                                                           
            18                     FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this JUDGMENT shall                                                
            19     be placed in the files of (1) U.S. Patent 6,098,879, (2) U.S. Patent 6,422,464                                    
            20     (3) application 09/922,935 and (4) application 10/623,656.                                                        
            21                     FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to distribute                                          
            22     the files upon entry of this JUDGMENT.                                                                            









                                                                 2                                                                   

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013