1 Luster requests adverse judgment. (Paper 30).
2 Upon consideration of the record of the interference and for reasons
3 given, it is
4 ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1, the sole
5 count of the interference, is entered against junior party ANDREW D.
6 LUSTER, PHILIP LEDER, MARC ROTHENBERG, and EDUARDO
7 GARCIA;
8 FURTHER ORDERED that junior party ANDREW D. LUSTER,
9 PHILIP LEDER, MARC ROTHENBERG, and EDUARDO GARCIA is not
10 entitled to a patent containing claims 3, 8, and 9 of patent 6,780,973, which
11 claims correspond to Count 1;
12 FURTHER ORDERED that, if there is a settlement agreement,
13 the parties are directed to 35 USC §135(c) and Bd. R. 205; and
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013