OPPERMANN et al. V. HEWICK et al. - Page 3



           1   statement and the indication that no authorized motions would be filed                  
           2   is an abandonment of the contest and construed as a request for                         
           3   adverse judgment.  37 CFR § 41.127(b)(4).                                               
           4         Accordingly, it is                                                                
           5         ORDERED that judgment on priority as to the subject matter                        
           6   of Count 1 (Paper 1, p. 3) is awarded against STRYKER                                   
           7   CORPORATION;                                                                            
           8         FURTHER ORDERED that STRYKER CORPORATION, is                                      
           9   not entitled to a patent containing claims  21-26, 27/21, 28, 29, 39,                   
          10   45-54, 58 (corresponding to Count 1) of Patent 5,266,683;                               
          11         FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be made                              
          12   of record in the file of Patent 5,266,683 and Application 08/319,831;                   
          13         FURTHER ORDERED that if there is any settlement                                   
          14   agreement which has not been filed, attention is directed to 35 U.S.C.                  
          15   § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 41.205; and                                                       

















                                              - 3 -                                                    

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013