Wylie V. Bravo et al. - Page 2



        1          Upon consideration of the Request for Adverse Judgment, it is hereby:                      
        2          ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1 (Paper 1, page 4) is                       
        3   awarded against junior party ARUN M. WYLIE.                                                       
        4          FURTHER ORDERED that junior party ARUN M. WYLIE is not entitled                            
        5   to a patent containing claims 1-11 (corresponding to Count 1) of patent 7,032,756                 
        6   B2.                                                                                               
        7          FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this paper shall be made of record in                       
        8   files of application 10/940,012 and patent 7,032,756 B2.                                          
        9          FURTHER ORDERED that as the parties have stated that there is a                            
       10   settlement agreement, the parties shall direct attention to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37             
       11   CFR § 41.205(a).                                                                                  
       12                                                                                                    
       13                       /Richard E. Schafer/            )                                             
       14                       RICHARD E. SCHAFER           )                                                
       15                       Administrative Patent Judge   )                                               
       16                                                     )                                             
       17                                                     )                                             
       18                       /Michael P. Tierney/              )  BOARD OF PATENT                          
       19                       MICHAEL P. TIERNEY            )    APPEALS AND                                
       20                       Administrative Patent Judge    )  INTERFERENCES                               
       21                                                       )                                             
       22                       /James T. Moore/                )                                             
       23                       JAMES T. MOORE            )                                                   
       24                       Administrative Patent Judge     )                                             
       25                                                                                                     

                                                     -2-                                                      



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013