Interference No. 105,567
Kato v. Lofgren
1 Junior party Kato did not intend to file any priority motion and was not authorized to file
2 any other motion (Paper 23). Senior party Lofgren was authorized to file an amendment to all its
3 involved claims changing each instance of “buffer memory” to “shift register” (Paper 23). The
4 amendment has been received. Junior party Kato has not filed a request for rehearing of the
5 order, dated September 12, 2007, not authorizing motions (Paper 23). Accordingly, it is
6 ORDERED that judgment on priority as to the subject matter of Count 1 is herein
7 entered against junior party Kato et al.;
8 FURTHER ORDERED that junior party Kato et al. is not entitled to a patent containing
9 its patent claims 1, 8-12, and 14-18 which correspond to Count 1;
10 FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, the parties should note
11 the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and Bd. Rule 205; and
12 FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be placed in the respective
13 involved application or patent of the parties.
/ss/ Jameson Lee )
JAMESON LEE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
/ss/ Michael P. Tierney ) BOARD OF PATENT
MICHAEL P. TIERNEY ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
/ss/ James T. Moore )
JAMES T. MOORE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013