The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CHARLES KANNANKERIL and RICHARD FREUNDLICH
____________
Appeal 2006-0153
Application 10/082,635
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: August 14, 2007
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHUNG K. PAK, and
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Examiner's final rejection of claims 12 through 31 (Br. 3). Claims 1 through
11, the other pending claims in the above-identified application, stand
withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a non-elected invention
(id). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013