Appeal 2006-0828
Application 10/252,175
We remain of the opinion that the prior art cited by the Examiner
establishes the obviousness of methods within the scope of the appealed
claims.
We have granted Appellants’ request to the extent we have
reconsidered our decision, but we deny it with respect to making any change
therein.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
DENIED
clj
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DIVISION - WEST BLDG.
WINTON HILL BUSINESS CENTER - BOX 412
6250 CENTER HILL AVE.
CINCINNATI, OH 45224
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3
Last modified: September 9, 2013