Ex Parte Schutz - Page 6

            Appeal Number: 2006-0921                                                                         
            Application Number: 10/083,079                                                                   

            We do not agree with the examiner that the appellant has admitted that the                       
            guides 10 and 26 tilt .  The examiner finds this admission in the amendment filed                
            by the appellant on July 30, 2003 (see final rejection on pages 8 to 9).   The                   
            appellant admits that the mounting tab 17  (not guides 10 and 13) may be tilted to               
            actuate the horn.  In addition, the appellant contends that the guides 10 would not              
            tilt even if  a large force is applied to the covering cap but that rather in that case          
            the upper portion of the bolt 10 will yield before the guides tilt.  In our view, such           
            is not an admission that the guides of Bohn tilt upon lateral pressing of the                    
            covering cap.                                                                                    
                   In view of the foregoing, we will not sustain this rejection.                             
                   We will likewise not sustain the examiner’s rejection of claim 5, which is                
            dependent on claim 1,  under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Bohn                     
            because in our view Bohn does not disclose nor does it suggest guides that tilt upon             
            laterally being pressed down.                                                                    











                                                     6                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013