Ex Parte Carter et al - Page 5

              Appeal No.  2006-0975                                                                                                             
              Application No.  10/079,792                                                                                                       


                     We will likewise not sustain this rejection as it is directed to claim 3 because                                           
              claim 3 includes language similar to the language in claim 1, i.e. that the solid member                                          
              has a first end with “the inner pivotal mounting integrally formed as an aperture within                                          
              the solid member” and an “outer pivotal mounting integrally formed as an aperture                                                 
              within the solid member near the second end.”                                                                                     
                     The decision of the examiner is reversed.                                                                                  
                                                     REVERSED                                                                                   





                                   MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD )                                                                                        
                                   Administrative Patent Judge )                                                                                
                                                                              )                                                                 
                                                                              )                                                                 
                                                                              )                                                                 
                                                                              ) BOARD OF PATENT                                                 
                                   JENNIFER D. BAHR )         APPEALS                                                                           
                                   Administrative Patent Judge )              AND                                                               
                                                                              )   INTERFERENCES                                                 
                                                                              )                                                                 
                                                                              )                                                                 
                                                                              )                                                                 
                                   LINDA E. HORNER )                                                                                            
                                   Administrative Patent Judge )                                                                                





                                                           5                                                                                    

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013