onecle

Ex Parte Fujii - Page 1



                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                                    
                              for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                          

                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                             
                                                        ____________                                                              
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                             
                                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                                                
                                                        ____________                                                              
                                                Ex parte KAZUHIRO FUJII                                                           
                                                        ____________                                                              
                                                   Appeal No. 2006-0985                                                           
                                                Application No. 09/766,696                                                        
                                                        ____________                                                              
                                                     ON BRIEF                                                                     
                                             _____________                                                                        

               Before PATE, OWENS and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                         
               PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                 

                                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                                               

                                              STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                               
                      This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-16, 66, 67, 69 and 77-                               
               82.  Claims 19-65 and 74-76 stand withdrawn from consideration.  Claims 68 and                                     
               70-73 have been previously allowed.  Claims 17 and 18 were allowed by the                                          
               examiner in the answer at page 2.  These are all the claims in the application.                                    
                      The claimed invention is a bracket for mounting a separate, self-contained                                  
               motor that controls the bicycle transmission to a bicycle frame.  The bracket has a                                




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013