The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte EVERETT HALL
____________
Appeal 2006-1143
Application 10/256,703
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before PATE, BAHR, and NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges.
PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 2, 5-7 and 9. Claims 17-22
were previously allowed, and claims 10-13 and 15 were allowed in the examiner's
answer. Claims 8 and 16 stand objected to as depending from a rejected independent
claims. These are all the claims in the application.
The claimed invention is directed to a suspension system for an automobile that
has front and rear hydraulic actuators. Claim 1, reproduced below, is further illustrative
of the claimed subject matter.
1. A suspension system for a vehicle, comprising:
a vehicle frame having a front section and a rear section;
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013