Ex Parte David et al - Page 1



                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
                             today was not written for publication and                          
                               is not binding precedent of the Board.                           

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                  
                                         ____________                                           
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                    
                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                           
                                         ____________                                           
                       Ex parte ETIENNE DAVID, JEAN-MICHEL DURET,                               
                                    DIDIER HERNANDEZ,                                           
                          DENIS SANDELIS and ALAIN WLOCZYSIAK                                   
                                         ____________                                           
                                       Appeal 2006-1263                                         
                                    Application 10/173,259                                      
                                    Technology Center 3700                                      
                                         ____________                                           
                                    Decided: March 20, 2007                                     
                                         ____________                                           

              Before TERRY J. OWENS, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, and                                   
              JENNIFER D. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                   

              MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.                                 

                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                          









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013