Appeal 2006-1679
Application 09/853,568
CONCLUSION
The Examiner has established that claim 22 is directed to subject
matter that does not have written description support in Appellant’s
Specification. The rejection of claims 22-26 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first
paragraph, is affirmed.
The Examiner has further established that claims 19-26 are
unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
ORDER
All rejections on appeal are affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2006).
AFFIRMED
hh
CONLEY ROSE, P.C.
P.O. BOX 3267
HOUSTON, TX 77253-3267
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Last modified: September 9, 2013