Ex Parte Snow - Page 12

                Appeal Number: 2006-1773                                                                                                
                Application Number: 10/051,000                                                                                          

                        Elements 4-7, which describe the purported function and value of the                                            
                document.  However, there is no functional relationship between the contents of                                         
                the documents and the underlying substrate recited in these limitations.  Therefore,                                    
                these are descriptions of non-functional descriptive material.  When descriptive                                        
                material is not functionally related to the substrate, the descriptive material will not                                
                distinguish the invention from the prior art in terms of patentability.  Further, this                                  
                element is a conjectural and aspirational characterization of the document, and                                         
                therefore does not limit the actual scope of the claimed document.                                                      
                        Elements 9-19, which describe the convention employed in describing the                                         
                moon’s subdivisions.  These elements form the bulk of the claim text, and of the                                        
                arguments proffered by the Appellant.  However, voluminous as this text is, there                                       
                is no functional relationship between the contents of the documents and the                                             
                underlying substrate recited in these limitations.  Therefore, these claim elements                                     
                are no more than characterizations of non-functional descriptive material.  When                                        
                descriptive material is not functionally related to the substrate, the descriptive                                      
                material will not distinguish the invention from the prior art in terms of                                              
                patentability.  Also, this convention for parceling property is a species of the genus                                  
                of Galaty’s convention of using longitudinal and latitudinal based meridian and                                         
                base lines.  Differences of spacing in lines drawn on printed paper are generally                                       
                obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art.  Similarly, differences in the                                        
                spacing of longitudinal and latitudinal based meridian and base lines used to                                           
                establish borders for property plats drawn on printed paper are generally obvious to                                    
                a person of ordinary skill in the art.  Whether particular purchasers would prefer a                                    
                particular size or location, as argued by the appellant, is a matter of subjective                                      
                preference, suggesting a limitation on the intended field of use, but does not                                          


                                                                  12                                                                    


Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013