The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ALBERT PHILIP VAN DUREN, ALLEN HAMID ZIAIMEHR,
JOHN PAUL ROCK, SCOTT DOUGLAS AUGUSTINE, GARY RABINDRANATH and
RANDALL CHARLES ARNOLD
____________
Appeal No. 2006-1824
Application No. 10/131,068
Technology Center 3700
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before OWENS, CRAWFORD and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
The appellants appeal from a rejection of claims 1-3, 7-15,
19-24, 28-30, 34-42 and 46-51. Claims 4-6, 16-18, 31-33 and 43-
45 stand objected to as dependent from a rejected claim but
allowable if rewritten in independent form. Claims 25-27 and 52-
54 have been canceled.
1. A convective system for controlling the temperature of a
person, comprising:
a blower;
an air hose with a first end receivable in the blower and a
second end;
a convective device with an inlet port to receive
pressurized air from the second end; and
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013