The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte THEODORE I. KAMINS, YONG CHEN
and PATRICIA A. BECK
____________
Appeal 2006-1826
Application 10/029,583
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: January 31, 2007
____________
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, PETER F. KRATZ, and
LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
ORDER REMANDING TO THE EXAMINER
We remand the application to the Examiner for consideration and
explanation of issues raised by the record. 37 C.F.R. §§ 41.35(b) and
41.50(a)(1). In particular, we remand this application to the Examiner to
clarify the record as to the propriety of the previously indicated entry of the
Reply Brief filed on December 22, 2005 with the continuation of this appeal.
The Examiner is required to take action in furnishing an appropriate
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013