Ex Parte Steenburg - Page 2



           Appeal 2006-1865                                                                         
           Application 09/660,433                                                                   
           Patent 5,802,641                                                                         

                                    I.  STATEMENT OF CASE                                           
                 1. Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of               
           claims 14-100 entered May 21, 2002.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.                
           § 6(b).                                                                                  
                 2. Independent claim 14 under appeal reads as follows:                             
                 Claim 14.   A leg positioning apparatus comprising                                 
                 a support device,                                                                  
                 a leg cradle coupled to the support device and movable about a first plurality     
           of axes relative to the support device,                                                  
                 a clamping device coupling the support device to a mounting device, the            
           clamping device being configured to clamp the motion of the support device               
           relative to the mounting device and to release the support device for rotative           
           movement relative to the mounting device about a second plurality of axes, the leg       
           cradle being movable about the first plurality of axes when the support device is        
           clamped against movement about the second plurality of axes,                             
                 an actuator device configured to move the clamping device to selectively           
           clamp and release the support device relative to the mounting device, and                
                 an operator device remote from the clamping device and remote from the             
           actuator device, the operator device being operatively coupled to the actuator           
           device, the operator device being configured to operate the actuator device.             
                 3. A copy of the claims 14-100 under appeal is set forth in the Claim              
           Appendix of Appellant’s Brief. 2                                                         
                                                                                                   
           2 Appellant’s grouping of claims at pages 2-3 of the Brief contains several minor        
           errors.  Claim “1000” will be read as claim “100”.  Claims 86-87 and 96-97 will be       
           grouped with claims 85 and 95 from which they depend respectively.                       
                                                - 2 -                                               

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013