1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
2 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board
3 ___________
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 ___________
6 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
7 AND INTERFERENCES
8 ___________
9 Ex parte SPX Corporation
10 ___________
11 Appeal 2006-1875
12 Reexamination Control No. 90/006,272
13 Technology Center 3900
14 ___________
15 DECIDED: March 14, 2007
16 ___________
17 Before LEE E. BARRETT, RICHARD TORCZON, and MICHAEL P.
17 TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
18
19 BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.
20 DECISION ON APPEAL
21 This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. §§ 134(a) and 306 from
22 the final rejection of claims 2-4, 6-10, 12-15, 17-19, and 21-23 under
23 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). Claims 1, 5, 11, 16, and 20 have been canceled.
24 We affirm.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013