onecle

Ex Parte 6039076 et al - Page 1



           1     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
           2              for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board                          
           3                                   ___________                                                   
           4            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
           5                                   ___________                                                   
           6                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
           7                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
           8                                   ___________                                                   
           9                             Ex parte SPX Corporation                                            
          10                                   ___________                                                   
          11                                 Appeal 2006-1875                                                
          12                      Reexamination Control No. 90/006,272                                       
          13                              Technology Center 3900                                             
          14                                   ___________                                                   
          15                           DECIDED:  March  14, 2007                                             
          16                                   ___________                                                   

          17   Before LEE E. BARRETT, RICHARD TORCZON, and MICHAEL P.                                        
          17 TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                          
          18                                                                                                 
          19   BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         

          20                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
          21         This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134(a) and 306 from                     
          22   the final rejection of claims 2-4, 6-10, 12-15, 17-19, and 21-23 under                        
          23   35 U.S.C.  102(b).  Claims 1, 5, 11, 16, and 20 have been canceled.                          
          24         We affirm.                                                                              








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013