1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
2 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 ____________________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 ____________________
10
11 Ex parte RICHARD BOHACIK and STANLEY DICKERSON
12 ____________________
13
14 Appeal 2006-1951
15 Application 10/392,1401
16 Technology Center 3700
17 ____________________
18
19 Decided: March 23, 2007
20 ____________________
21
22 Before STUART S. LEVY, ROBERT E. NAPPI, and ANTON W.
23 FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges.
24
25 LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.
26
27
28 DECISION ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
29
30 STATEMENT OF CASE
31 Appellants request Rehearing of our Decision on Appeal dated
32 September 27, 2006. In our Decision, we affirmed the rejection of claims
33 10-13.
1Application filed March 19, 2003. The real party in interest is the
inventors.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013