onecle

Ex Parte Bohacik et al - Page 1



             1      The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                                    
             2                 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board                                          
             3                                                                                                                    
             4              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                             
             5                                    ____________________                                                            
             6                                                                                                                    
             7                     BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                             
             8                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                                                
             9                                    ____________________                                                            
            10                                                                                                                    
            11            Ex parte RICHARD BOHACIK and STANLEY DICKERSON                                                          
            12                                    ____________________                                                            
            13                                                                                                                    
            14                                       Appeal 2006-1951                                                             
            15                                    Application 10/392,1401                                                         
            16                                    Technology Center 3700                                                          
            17                                    ____________________                                                            
            18                                                                                                                    
            19                                   Decided: March 23, 2007                                                          
            20                                    ____________________                                                            
            21                                                                                                                    
            22     Before STUART S. LEVY, ROBERT E. NAPPI, and ANTON W.                                                           
            23     FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                         
            24                                                                                                                    
            25     LEVY,  Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                            
            26                                                                                                                    
            27                                                                                                                    
            28                      DECISION ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING                                                             
            29                                                                                                                    
            30                                    STATEMENT OF CASE                                                               
            31            Appellants request Rehearing of our Decision on Appeal dated                                            
            32     September 27, 2006.  In our Decision, we affirmed the rejection of claims                                      
            33     10-13.                                                                                                         

                                                                                                                                 
                   1Application filed March 19, 2003.  The real party in interest is the                                          
                   inventors.                                                                                                     



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013