onecle

Ex Parte McClelland - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                           
                            for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                 

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                    
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                     
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                      Ex parte LARRY W. MCCLELLAND                                                     
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                                 Appeal 2006-2010                                                      
                                              Application 10/349,684                                                   
                                             Technology Center 3700                                                    
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                             Decided: March 16, 2007                                                   
                                                   ____________                                                        

                 Before TERRY J. OWENS, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, and HUBERT C.                                             
                 LORIN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                  
                 OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                   

                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                        The Appellant appeals from a rejection of claims 1-8.  Claims 9-28                             
                 stand withdrawn from consideration by the Examiner as claiming a                                      
                 nonelected invention.                                                                                 








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013