The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte FERNANDO MAURO MARCILIO
____________
Appeal 2006-2056
Application 10/102,192
Technology Center 3700
____________
Decided: March 28, 2007
____________
Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, TERRY J. OWENS, and JENNIFER D.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
PATE, III, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 3, 6, and 12-20.
The rejection of claims 1-11 based on prior art was withdrawn by the
Examiner in the Answer.
The claimed invention is directed to a method of playing a card game
and equipment used for playing the game. Claim 12 reproduced below is
further indicative of the claimed subject matter:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013