Ex Parte Jakobsson - Page 3

              Appeal 2006-2107                                                                     
              Application 09/969,833                                                               
                    value being stored in the memory and utilizable to facilitate                  
                    subsequent computation of another one of the output values.                    
                    The Examiner rejected claims 1-22 under 35 U.S.C. § 101 because the            
              claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter.                       
                    The Examiner entered a Final Rejection on May 4, 2005.                         
                    Appellant appealed from the Final Rejection.  An Appeal Brief (the             
              Brief) was filed on November 8, 2005.                                                
                    The Examiner entered an Examiner’s Answer (the Answer) on                      
              January 26, 2006.                                                                    
                    Appellant did not file a Reply Brief.                                          
                    We affirm.                                                                     

                                            II.  ISSUE                                             
                    The sole issue before us is whether Appellant has established that the         
              Examiner erred in rejecting claims 1-22 under 35 U.S.C. § 101 as being               
              directed to non-statutory subject matter.                                            

                                     III.  FINDINGS OF FACT                                        
                    The following findings of fact are supported by a preponderance of             
              the evidence.                                                                        
                    1. Appellant invented a method, apparatus, and machine readable                
              medium (storing one or more programs) for generating one or more output              
              values of a one-way chain.  (Specification 4).                                       
                    2. One-way chains are used in processor based cryptographic                    
              applications such as encryption, decryption, digital signatures, message             
              authentication, user and device authentication, micro-payments, etc.                 
              (Specification 1:13-15 and 4:1-7).                                                   
                                                3                                                  

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013