The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TIMOTHY WILLIAM DAKE,
JARAD BOHART NIEMI,
DONALD LEE HUGHES,
JEFFREY JOHN KESTER,
DONALD BROWN COMPTON,
JONATHAN JAVIER CALDERAS,
RICHARD GERARD SCHAFERMEYER and
KEVIN PATRICK CHRISTMAS
____________
Appeal 2006-2158
Application 09/853,391
Technology Center
____________
Decided: January 31, 2007
____________
Before THOMAS A. WALTZ , PETER F. KRATZ, and
CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
ORDER REMANDING TO THE EXAMINER
Our review of the record in this appeal leads us to conclude that this
appeal is not ripe for a decision on the merits. The rejections reproduced in
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013