onecle

Ex Parte Fitzell - Page 1



                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is                                 
                                        not binding precedent of the Board.                                             

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                     
                                                   ____________                                                         
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                      
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                   ____________                                                         
                                   Ex parte JAMES RICHARD FITZELL, JR.                                                  
                                                   ____________                                                         
                                                 Appeal 2006-2211                                                       
                                               Application 10/266,215                                                   
                                             Technology Center 1700                                                     
                                                   ____________                                                         
                                               Decided: July 30, 2007                                                   
                                                   ____________                                                         
                 Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHUNG K. PAK, and LINDA M.                                                    
                 GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                
                 KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                   


                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                         
                        This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-29.  Claim 1 is                          
                 illustrative:                                                                                          
                        1.  An apparatus for producing a sheet of thermoplastic with variable                           
                 thickness from a molten thermoplastic, comprising:                                                     
                        a plurality of rollers, wherein the molten thermoplastic material will                          
                 pass between a pair of said rollers to be formed into the sheet; and                                   




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013