1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered
2 today is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4
5 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
6 _____________
7
8 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
9 AND INTERFERENCES
10 _____________
11
12 Ex parte MANOHARPRASAD K. RAO, KWAKU O. PRAKAH-ASANTE,
13 and GARY STEVEN STRUMOLO
14 _____________
15
16 Appeal No. 2006-2294
17 Application No. 09/683,779
18 Technology Center 3600
19 ______________
20
21 Decided: August 29, 2007
22 _______________
23
23 Before TERRY J. OWENS, HUBERT C. LORIN, and DAVID B. WALKER,
24
24 Administrative Patent Judges.
25
26
26 OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
27
28
29
30 DECISION ON APPEAL
31 The Appellants appeal from a rejection of claims 1-20, which are all of the
32 pending claims.
33 THE INVENTION
34 The Appellants claim a pre-crash sensing system and a method for operating
35 it. Claim 1 is illustrative:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013